Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 23930

AbstractDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : October | Volume : 17 | Issue : 10 | Page : PE01 - PE04 Full Version

Robotic-assisted Surgery and its Impact on Patient Outcomes: A Narrative Review


Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/66770.18564
Simran Chauhan, Raju K Shinde, Yashraj Jain

1. Junior Resident, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Yashraj Jain,
Junior Resident, Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: jain8yashraj@gmail.com

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery is an advanced surgical technique that combines the skill of a surgeon with the precision and capabilities of robotic systems. This approach has revolutionised the field of medicine by providing enhanced visualisation, improved dexterity, and greater control during surgical procedures.The most widely used robotic system is the da Vinci surgical System, which allows surgeons to perform minimally invasive surgeries with smaller incisions, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery time for patients. Robotic-assisted surgery has been successfully applied in various specialities, including gynaecology, urology, general surgery, and thoracic surgery. It offers benefits such as enhanced surgical precision, better outcomes, and improved postoperative quality of life. However, the decision to use robotic-assisted surgery depends on factors such as patient suitability, surgeon expertise, and the availability of robotic systems. Ongoing advancements in robotic technology continue to shape the future of surgical practice, with the potential for further improvements in surgical techniques and patient care. Overall, robotic-assisted surgery represents a significant milestone in surgical innovation, providing a promising approach to improve surgical outcomes and patient well-being. The present narrative review describes the effect of robotic surgery in different disciplines and its effects on surgical outcomes.

Keywords

Colorectal, Da Vinci, Gynaecology, Myomectomy, Prostate, Thoracic

Surgery is a medical speciality that has been practiced for centuries and has evolved significantly over time with advancements in technology, anaesthesia, and surgical techniques. The primary goal of surgery is to improve a patient’s health or quality of life by physically altering or repairing a part of their body. Surgeries can be broadly categorised into two main types: elective and emergency. Elective surgeries are planned in advance and are usually not urgent, allowing both the patient and the surgical team to prepare adequately [1-4]. Surgical procedures can be performed using traditional open techniques or minimally invasive approaches.

Open Surgical Procedure

Open surgery involves making a larger incision to access the affected area directly, while minimally invasive surgery involves making smaller incisions and using specialised instruments, cameras, and video monitors to guide the surgeon. Minimally invasive techniques often result in less pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery time for patients (5). Advancements in surgical techniques and technology have revolutionised the field of surgery. For instance, robotic-assisted surgery allows surgeons to perform complex procedures with enhanced precision and control. Additionally, techniques such as laparoscopy, endoscopy, and arthroscopy have enabled less invasive treatment options for various conditions (4).

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedure

A number of significant technical developments in surgery during the past several years have revolutionised the discipline and enhanced patient outcomes. These methods entail employing tiny incisions, specialised tools, and cameras to carry out surgical procedures. Robotic surgery has become increasingly popular. Surgical accuracy, dexterity, and visualisation are improved for surgeons using robotic devices like the da Vinci Surgical System. The surgeon may operate from a console with a 3D image of the surgical site, and the robotic arms are capable of performing complex motions. The surgical disciplines of urology, gynaecology, general surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery have all utilised this technique (5). Image-guided surgery has been made possible by advancements in imaging technologies, including Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and ultrasound. Real-time imaging allows surgeons to accurately find and target regions of interest during operations. In neurosurgery, orthopaedic surgery, and several cancer operations, this technology is extremely useful. Surgical navigation systems direct surgeons through surgeries by using computerised tracking and imaging techniques (6). These technologies offer immediate input on how surgical tools are situated in relation to the anatomy of the patient. They improve accuracy and lower the likelihood of problems in complicated procedures like spine surgery and joint replacement. Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery, often known as SILS, is a specialised type of minimally invasive surgery that entails carrying out the whole treatment through a single, tiny incision, frequently buried within the navel (7). The benefit of this method is that it leaves almost no scars and further reduces bodily damage. The development of patient-specific models, implants, and surgical guidance is now possible because to 3D printing technology. With continual research and development, the discipline is always changing with the goal of further advancing surgical procedures, promoting patient safety, and improving surgical results (8). Robotic-assisted surgery minimises the risk of human error, which is why it is necessary to have the in depth knowledge about the procedure. Also, robotic-assisted surgeries are only deployed in specific surgeries, therefore more comprehensive studies are required for extending its usage to other unexplored medical and surgical procedures.

Discussion

Robotic-assisted Surgeries

Overall, surgery plays a critical role in modern medicine, offering life-saving interventions, alleviating symptoms, and improving the quality of life for countless individuals worldwide Robotic-assisted surgery, also known as robot-assisted surgery, is an advanced surgical technique that combines the expertise of a surgeon with the precision and capabilities of robotic systems. It involves the use of robotic platforms to assist surgeons in performing complex procedures with enhanced accuracy, control, and visualisation. In robotic-assisted surgery, the surgeon controls the robotic system from a console, using hand and finger movements to manipulate robotic arms equipped with surgical instruments (9). The system translates the surgeon’s movements into precise actions performed by the robotic arms, which are capable of rotating, bending, and manoeuvring with a high degree of dexterity. The surgeon views the surgical site in real-time through a magnified 3D high-definition camera, providing a detailed and immersive visualisation of the operative field. One of the key components of robotic-assisted surgery is the surgical robot itself. The most well-known and widely used robotic surgical system is the da Vinci Surgical System, developed by Intuitive Surgical. The da Vinci system consists of a console where the surgeon sits, robotic arms that hold and manipulate the surgical instruments, and a vision system that provides a magnified view of the surgical site (10),(11).

Robotic system allows for precise and delicate movements, reducing the risk of human errors and providing greater surgical accuracy. The high-definition 3D camera provides a detailed view of the surgical site, enabling the surgeon to see anatomical structures more clearly. The robotic arms can rotate and bend with a wider range of motion than the human hand, allowing for improved manoeuvrability in tight spaces. Robotic-assisted surgery often requires smaller incisions compared to traditional open surgery, resulting in less scarring, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery times for patients. The robotic system can reduce any human error that may occur due to jerky or tremulous hand movement that may arise during prolonged surgeries. Robotic-assisted surgery has the potential for remote or telesurgery, where a surgeon can operate on a patient in a different location using the robotic system. This can be particularly valuable in cases where specialised expertise is not locally available. It’s important to note that robotic-assisted surgery is not entirely autonomous. The robotic system is controlled by the surgeon throughout the procedure, and the surgeon remains in complete control of all actions performed by the robot (9).

Robotics in Urosurgery

A minimally invasive surgical approach used to treat prostate cancer is robotic prostate surgery, more precisely robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. The treatment makes use of a robotic surgical technology, such as the da Vinci Surgical technology, to help the physician remove the prostate gland with precision and control. A whole prostate gland, including the malignant tissue, is removed during a robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. During the surgery, the robotic technology gives the surgeon better visualisation, dexterity, and tool control. Robotic prostate surgery attempts to reduce the possibility of developing erectile dysfunction after surgery, hence, nerve preservation is a crucial component of the procedure. The robotic device enhances the surgeon’s capacity to spare the nerves while removing the prostate by enabling accurate dissection and identification of the nerves. To determine whether cancer has progressed beyond the prostate, a lymph node dissection may occasionally be carried out during robotic prostate surgery. This aids in estimating the disease’s severity and directing future therapy choices. A thorough dissection of the lymph nodes is made possible by the robotic system’s better visualisation and exact instrument control (11).

Compared to open surgery, robotic prostate surgery has a number of benefits, including smaller incisions, less blood loss, a decreased chance of complications, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery periods. The robotic technology gives the surgeon more accuracy and manoeuvrability, enabling more precise prostate removal with less harm to the surrounding tissues. Robotic prostate surgery demands a surgeon with advanced training and skills. It’s crucial to remember that whether or not a patient chooses to have robotic prostate surgery relies on a number of variables, including the cancer’s stage and severity, the patient’s general health, and personal preferences (12),(13).

Robotic kidney surgery, more particularly robotic-assisted radical and partial nephrectomies, is a minimally invasive surgical technique used to treat a variety of kidney disorders, including kidney cancer and some benign kidney tumours. A robotic surgical device, such as the da Vinci Surgical device, is used during the procedure to help the physician execute precise and controlled surgery on the kidneys. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy is a surgical operation used to remove part of the kidney, while leaving the healthy kidney tissue in place. It is frequently used to treat tiny kidney tumours or tumours that are located in a way that avoids the need to completely remove the kidney. Precision dissection, suturing, and preservation of the blood arteries feeding the kidney are all made possible by the robotic system. The main objective of partial nephrectomy is to preserve kidney function, and robotic assistance makes it easier to remove tumours precisely while causing the least amount of harm to healthy kidney tissue (14),(15).

In situations where kidney cancer has advanced or for bigger tumours that cannot be adequately treated with partial nephrectomy, robotic-assisted radical nephrectomy entails the total removal of the kidney, along with any surrounding tissues or lymph nodes. During the surgery, the robotic system gives the surgeon better visibility, dexterity, and control, enabling careful dissection and removal of the kidney and related tissues. Renal reconstruction may need difficult reconstructive treatments, such as mending or reconstructing the arteries or urine collecting system. The surgeon may complete complex reconstructive procedures with the robotic system’s accuracy and manoeuvrability while retaining maximal renal function (15).

Robotics in Surgical Gastroenterology

In situations of oesophageal cancer or serious benign diseases, a robotic oesophagectomy is a minimally invasive surgical operation used to remove all or a portion of the oesophagus. Compared to conventional open surgery, the robotic technology enables accurate oesophageal dissection and repair with a wider range of motion. The use of robotic arms by surgeons to access difficult-to-reach places and carry out precise suturing leads to better results and fewer problems [16-19].

It’s crucial to remember that the accessibility and suitability of robotic-assisted treatments, such as oesophagectomy and enucleation, might differ based on the particular medical facility, the level of surgical skill, and patient characteristics. Based on the needs of each patient and the advice of the surgical team, the decision to proceed with robotic surgery is taken (20).

A minimally invasive surgical technique called robotic colorectal surgery, or more particularly robotic-assisted colorectal surgery, is used to treat a variety of colorectal disorders, such as colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and benign colorectal tumours. A robotic surgical device, such the da Vinci Surgical device, is used during the procedure to help the physician execute precise and controlled surgery on the colon and rectum. Depending on the exact problem being treated, a section of the colon or rectum may be removed during robotic-assisted colorectal surgery. During the surgery, the robotic technology gives the surgeon better visualisation, dexterity, and tool control. To implant robotic arms fitted with surgical tools and a high-definition 3D camera, small abdominal incisions are created. Surgery using robotic assistance is becoming more common for the treatment of colorectal cancer. It may entail techniques like robotic-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) or robotic-assisted low anterior resection. These procedures try to preserve as much good intestinal tissue as they can while removing the malignant tissue. Precision dissection and suturing are made possible by the robotic technology, improving results and lowering problems. Robotic-assisted surgery can be used to treat inflammatory bowel diseases like Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis. To remove the diseased colon or rectum, surgeons may use techniques like proctocolectomy or robotic-assisted colectomy. The features of the robotic system enable accurate surgical manoeuvres and aid in attaining the best results. Rectal prolapse, diverticulitis, and other benign colorectal disorders are among the benign colorectal conditions that can be treated using robotic surgery. The exact removal of polyps and repair of the afflicted regions made possible by the robotic technology enhance patient outcomes and lower hazards (21).

Robotics in Gynaecology

Robotic gynaecologic surgery is the practice of conducting different gynaecological treatments using robotic equipment (19). Robotic assistance may be used during hysterectomy, a surgical procedure to remove the uterus. The robotic technology enables a careful and exact dissection, improving the preservation of nearby structures and lowering the possibility of problems (20).

Myomectomy is a surgical treatment that removes uterine fibroids while leaving the uterus intact. The robotic system’s improved vision and dexterity make it possible to remove fibroids more precisely. Compared to open surgery, this less invasive method has fewer scars, quicker recovery periods, and greater fertility preservation (21). Endometriosis lesions can be excised or removed with robotic assistance. The endometrial implants may be precisely dissected and removed using the robotic system, causing the least amount of harm to the surrounding healthy tissue. The affected person may get excellent symptom reduction and an improvement in quality of life after robotic endometriosis surgery (20),(22),(23),(24).

A surgical treatment known as a sacrocolpopexy is performed to treat pelvic organ prolapse, a condition in which the vagina or other pelvic organs sink or protrude from their natural placements. The robotic system is used in robotic-assisted sacro colpopexy to link a synthetic mesh to the sacrum and the top of the vagina in order to give support and restore the natural anatomy. Sacrocolpopexy performed robotically has benefits including enhanced visualisation, exact mesh implantation, and less postoperative discomfort (23),(24),(25),(26),(27).

The usage of robotic-assisted surgery is growing in the field of gynaecologic oncology. Procedures like robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer or robotic-assisted staging and debulking operations for ovarian cancer are just a few examples (28). The features of the robotic system allow surgeons to carry out intricate treatments with higher accuracy and less invasiveness, improving patient outcomes. Plan of treatment varies depending upon the stage of disease and operability and varies from patient to patient (29),(30),(31),(32). Following are some studies that show success and progress in robotic-assisted surgeries (Table/Fig 1) (33),(34),(35),(36),(37).

Conclusion

In conclusion, robotic-assisted surgery has completely changed the way medicine is practised, benefiting both patients and doctors in multiple ways. The introduction of robotic devices, such the da Vinci Surgical System, has boosted surgical precision, improved visualisation, and dexterity, enabling for the more precise and controlled completion of difficult surgeries. Numerous specialities, including gynaecology, urology, general surgery, thoracic surgery, and more, have successfully used robotic-assisted surgery. Robotic assistance has tremendously helped procedures, including hysterectomy, prostatectomy, nephrectomy, and colorectal surgery, resulting in smaller incisions, less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and quicker recovery periods for patients.

References

1.
Fernández-Cruz L. General surgery as education, not specialization. Ann Surg. 2004;240:932-38. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Downs AR. General surgery. Arch Surg. 1982;117(7):983. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Potts JR. General surgery residency: Past, present, and future. Curr Probl Surg. 2019;56:170-72. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Leppäniemi A. General surgery--a vision for the future. Scand J Surg. 2011;100:70-71. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1918911. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Griffen WO. General surgery, a true specialty. Surgery. 1991;109:114-15.
7.
Maruthappu M, Sharma A, Shalhoub J, Davies A. General surgery: Allow its extinction or begin its revival? Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2011;72:304-05. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Mateo Vallejo F. General surgery: Present and future. Int J Surg. 2012;10:176-77. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Maza G, Sharma A. Past, present, and future of robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020;53:935-41. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Denning NL, Kallis MP, Prince JM. Pediatric robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100(2):431-43. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Becker F, Morgül H, Katou S, Juratli M, Hölzen JP, Pascher A, et al. Robotic liver surgery- current standards and future perspectives. Z Gastroenterol. 2021;59(1):56-62. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Khosla A, Wagner AA. Robotic surgery of the kidney, bladder, and prostate. Surg Clin North Am. 2016;96:615-36. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Davis M, Egan J, Marhamati S, Galfano A, Kowalczyk KJ. Retzius-Sparing robot-assisted robotic prostatectomy: Past, present, and future. Urol Clin North Am. 2021;48:11-23. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Van Batavia JP, Casale P. Robotic surgery of the kidney and ureter in pediatric patients. Curr Urol Rep. 2013;14:373-78. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Hameed AM, Yao J, Allen RDM, Hawthorne WJ, Pleass HC, Lau H. The evolution of kidney transplantation surgery into the robotic era and its prospects for obese recipients.Transplantation. 2018;102:1650-65. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Jara RD, Guerrón AD, Portenier D. Complications of robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100:461-68. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Williams MD, Grunvald MW, Skertich NJ, Hayden DM, O’Donoghue C, Torquati A, et al. Disruption in general surgery: Randomized controlled trials and changing paradigms. Surgery. 2021;170:1862-66. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Bass BL. Fundamental changes in general surgery residency training. Am Surg. 2007;73:109-13. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Alip SL, Kim J, Rha KH, Han WK. Future platforms of robotic surgery. Urol Clin North Am. 2022;49:23-38. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Froiio C, Berlth F, Capovilla G, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E, Mann C, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery for esophageal submucosal tumors: A single-center case series. Updates Surg. 2022;74:1043-54. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Moglia A, Georgiou K, Georgiou E, Satava RM, Cuschieri A. A systematic review on artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery. Int J Surg. 2021;95:106151. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Siddiqui KM, Albala DM. Robotic-assisted surgery and treatment of urolithiasis. Int J Surg. 2016;36:673-75. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Micha JP, Rettenmaier MA, Bohart RD, Goldstein BH. Robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of breast and cervical cancers. JSLS. 2022;26(2):e2022.00014. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Falagario U, Veccia A, Weprin S, Albuquerque EV, Nahas WC, Carrieri G, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of urologic cancers: Recent advances. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020;17:579-90. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Bush SH, Apte SM. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynaecological oncology. Cancer Control. 2015;22:307-13. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Burton J, Wong R, Padhya T. Robotic-assisted surgery in the head and neck. Cancer Control. 2015;22:331-34. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Sandhu RS, Cheung F. Robotic-assisted surgery-a highly effective modality for vesicovaginal fistula repairs. Curr Urol Rep. 2023;24:117-20. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Dunn D. Robotic-assisted surgery: A brief history to understand today’s practices. AORN J. 2022;115(3):217-21.[crossref][PubMed]
29.
Wickham JE. The new surgery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;295:1581-82. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Grabenwöger M. The power of surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:1321-23. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Devon K. The practice of surgery. Narrat Inq Bioeth. 2015;5:E1-2. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Jones AT, Barry CL, Ibáñez B, Buyske J. Using multiple modes of assessment in general surgery for board certification. Am J Surg. 2021;222:706-08. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Park JS, Lee SM, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Song SH, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancers: The COLRAR randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2023;278(1):31-38. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Roh HF, Nam SH, Kim JM. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191628. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Zeuschner P, Linxweiler J, Mohr R, van Heemskerk S, Wagenpfeil G, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: A cohort study on perioperative outcomes accounting for stage selection bias and surgical experience. Int J Med Robot. 2021;17:e2258. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Li A, Stanislaus CT, Steffens D, McBride KE, Leslie S, Thanigasalam R, et al. Prospective cohort study investigating quality of life outcomes following multi-speciality robotic-assisted surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2023; Apr 13 (Online ahead of print). [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Gu Z, Huang J, Tian Y, Jiang L, Luo Q. A retrospective comparative cohort study on the efficacy and safety of bi-port robotic-assisted lobectomy and multi-port robotic-assisted lobectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2022;14(8):2970-76.[crossref][PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/66770.18564

Date of Submission: Jul 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 29, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 20, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 28, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 31, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 18, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com